From: Côme Chilliet <come@chilliet.eu>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:34:09 +0000 (+0700)
Subject: Using at() instead of operator[] in currentFrame to get more precise crashes
X-Git-Url: https://git.jsancho.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=aa8b8b684f7c5f6edd86049eab22b5ee5bc15dbe;p=lugaru.git

Using at() instead of operator[] in currentFrame to get more precise crashes
---

diff --git a/Source/Person.h b/Source/Person.h
index ebdde32..cb62622 100644
--- a/Source/Person.h
+++ b/Source/Person.h
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ public:
     inline Joint& joint(int bodypart) { return skeleton.joints[skeleton.jointlabels[bodypart]]; }
     inline XYZ& jointPos(int bodypart) { return joint(bodypart).position; }
     inline XYZ& jointVel(int bodypart) { return joint(bodypart).velocity; }
-    inline AnimationFrame& currentFrame() { return Animation::animations[animCurrent].frames[frameCurrent]; }
-    inline AnimationFrame& targetFrame() { return Animation::animations[animTarget].frames[frameTarget]; }
+    inline AnimationFrame& currentFrame() { return Animation::animations.at(animCurrent).frames.at(frameCurrent); }
+    inline AnimationFrame& targetFrame() { return Animation::animations.at(animTarget).frames.at(frameTarget); }
 
 
     void CheckKick();