Using at() instead of operator[] in currentFrame to get more precise crashes

diff --git a/Source/Person.h b/Source/Person.h
index ebdde320af4f487e1784ac8ecb80084db61278ff..cb62622f0710f4984aa2e846e5797cde223dd139 100644 (file)
--- a/Source/Person.h
+++ b/Source/Person.h
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ public:
     inline Joint& joint(int bodypart) { return skeleton.joints[skeleton.jointlabels[bodypart]]; }
     inline XYZ& jointPos(int bodypart) { return joint(bodypart).position; }
     inline XYZ& jointVel(int bodypart) { return joint(bodypart).velocity; }
-    inline AnimationFrame& currentFrame() { return Animation::animations[animCurrent].frames[frameCurrent]; }
-    inline AnimationFrame& targetFrame() { return Animation::animations[animTarget].frames[frameTarget]; }
+    inline AnimationFrame& currentFrame() { return Animation::animations.at(animCurrent).frames.at(frameCurrent); }
+    inline AnimationFrame& targetFrame() { return Animation::animations.at(animTarget).frames.at(frameTarget); }
 
 
     void CheckKick();